Pensando programas curriculares como os projetistas pensam
Pensando programas curriculares como os projetistas pensam
Índice
As instituições de ensino superior têm de estar alerta para as mudanças que ocorrem na sociedade e por isso precisam inovar e transformar os seus programas curriculares. Uma ferramenta usada para potenciar a inovação nas empresas é a metodologia Pensando como um Projetista (Design Thinking). Será esta ferramenta útil também para o desenvolvimento de programas curriculares? O presente artigo procura uma resposta a esta questão apresentando a metodologia Pensando como um Projetista, discutindo a sua adequação no contexto de instituições de ensino superior e defendendo a articulação entre esta metodologia com o ensino assente em resultados (outcome based education), com princípios de alinhamento construtivo, como forma mais eficiente de desenvolver programas curriculares em instituições do ensino superior.
Rogério Duarte holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Lisbon University, Portugal, and is Associate Professor at the Mechanical Engineering Department of Escola Superior de Tecnologia de Setúbal, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Portugal. Along his core research activities in building physics/energy conservation, he is also interested in promoting and researching quality in higher education institutions and equity for mature learners in higher education.
Ângela Lacerda Nobre has an academic background in nursing and economics, has a master in Applied Economics, a post-graduation in Philosophy, Psychoanalytical Training and a Ph.D. in Information Systems (Semiotic Learning: a conceptual framework to facilitate learning in knowledge-intensive organisations). She has professional experience as a nurse and as an economist; she is an Associate Professor at ESCE, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal (esce.ips.pt). She has published her research in the areas of semiotics, psychoanalysis, practical philosophy, knowledge management and organisational learning.
Fernando Pimentel has a MSc in Civil Engineering and is Associate Professor at the School of Technology (Setúbal) of the Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal. Fernando Pimentel researches in the field of pedagogy in engineering teaching and is interested in quality in Higher Education Institutions.
Marc Jacquinet has a PhD in Economics from ISEG, Portugal, is currently Associate Professor (Economics and Management) at Universidade Aberta, Portugal and is affiliated to the research centres CIEO and CEMRI at Universidade do Algarve and Universidade Aberta, respectively.
A3ES, 2013 (acedido a 2021.05.05). Regulations on the assessment and accreditation procedures—Agency for the Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education. [Online] . Available:https://www.a3es.pt/en/accreditation-and-audit/normative-framework/regulations-assessment-and-accreditation-procedures.
ABET, 2020 (acedido a 2020.01.19) Abet homepage. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/
Adam, S., 2004, “Using learning outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for european education of emplying learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels,” United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, Tech. Rep. [Online]. Available: http://www.aic.lv/ace/ace disk/Bologna/Bol semin/Edinburgh/
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., Smith, D., 1985, Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Banter, J. et al., 2020, “Using design thinking as a student-centered approach to enhance an undergraduate leadership program”, Journal of Leadership Education, [s. I.], vol. 19, n.3, pp. 69-74.
Biggs, J., Tang, C., 2011, Teaching for quality learning at university, McGraw-Hill & Open University Press.
Brown, T., 2008, “Design Thinking”, Harvard Business Review, June
Brown, T., Katz, B., 2009, Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, (revised and updated), Harper Collins Publishers.
Costa, M., 2016, Desvalorização das humanidades. Universidade, transformações sociais e neoliberalismo, Tese de doutoramento, ISCTE, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/12371/1/tese%20nova%20subcapa.pdf).
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D., 2007, Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach, Springer Science.
Cross, N., 2006, Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer-Verlag, ISBN 9781846283000.
Dubberly-Design-Office. (2020, Feb.). [Online]. Available: http://www.dubberly.com/models
Dunne, D., Martin. R., 2006, “Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 512–523.
ESG, 2015, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels, Belgium.
Felder, R., Brent, R., 2003, “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria,” Journal of Engineering Education, no. 92, pp. 7–25.
Geoghegan, M. C., Pangaro, P., 2009, “Design for a self–regenerating organisation,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 155–173.
Gharajedaghi, J., 2011, System thinking: Managing chaos and complexity. A platform for design business architecture, 3rd ed. Elsevier.
Jones, J. C., 1992, Design Methods, 2nd ed. Wiley, ISBN: 978-0-47128496-3.
Kanji, G., Malek, A., Tambi, A., 1999, “Total quality management in UK higher education institutions”. Total Quality Management, vol. 10, n. 1, pp. 129–153.
Kolb, D., 2014, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, 2nd ed. Pearson FT Press.
Leavy, B., 2011, “Roger Martin explores three big ideas: customer capitalism, integrative thinking and design thinking (interview),” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 19–26.
Lee, C.-H., Lee, L., Kuptasthien, N., 2018, “Design thinking for CDIO curriculum development”, in Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, June 28 – July 2, 2018.
Luka, I., 2014, “Design thinking in pedagogy,” Journal of Education Culture and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 63–74, [Online]. Available: https://jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/686
Luka, I., 2019, “Design thinking in pedagogy: Frameworks and uses,” European Journal of Education, vol. 54, pp. 499–512.
Martin, R., 2004, “The design of business,” Rotman Management, pp. 7–11, Winter 2004, (Accessed on March 2013). [Online]. Available: http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/rogermartin/DesignofBusiness.pdf
Martin, R., 2010, “Design thinking: achieving insights via the “knowledge funnel”,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 37–41.
Martin, R., Euchner, J., 2012, “Design thinking: An interview with Roger Martin,” Research Technology Management, pp. 10–14, May-June 2012.
Newton, J., 2002, “Barriers to effective quality management and leadership: Case study of two academic departments”, Higher Education, vol. 44, pp. 185-212.
Mejias, S. et al., 2019, “The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway”, Science Education, vol. 105, pp. 209-231.
Pusca, D., Northwood, D., 2018, “Design thinking and its application to problem solving”, Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 20, pp. 48-53.
Schein, E. H., 1999, “Kurt Lewin’s change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning,” Reflections, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–74. [Online]. Available: https://www.solonline.org/?SoLReflectionsIndex
Schreurs, J., Dumbraveanu, R., 2014, “A shift from teacher centered to learner centered approach”, International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 36-41.
Simon, H. A., 1988, “The science of design: Creating the artificial,” Design Issues, vol. 4, no. 1/2 (Designing the Immaterial Society), pp. 67–82.
Spady, W., 1988, “Organising the results: The basis of authentic restructuring and reform.” Educational Leadership, vol. 46, n. 2, pp. 4-8.
Walters, H., 2011, ‘“Design Thinking” isn’t a miracle cure, but here’s how it helps’. FastCompany.com, Co.Design @ONLINE. (Accessed on March 2013). [Online]. Available: http://www.fastcompany.com/1742299/design-thinking-isntmiracle-cure-heres-how-it-helps
Westera, W., 2004, “On strategies of educational innovation: Between substitution and transformation,” Higher Education, vol. 47, pp. 501–517.
Willness, C., Bruni-Bosso, V., 2017, “The curriculum innovation canvas: A design thinking framework for the engaged educational entrepreneur”, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, vol. 21, n. 1, pp.134-164.
programa curricular, pensando como um projetista, ensino centrado no estudante, ensino assente em resultados, alinhamento construtivo, inovação, ensino superior
