Quality Management in Higher Education. Using SERVPERF to assess services quality
Quality Management in Higher Education. Using SERVPERF to assess services quality
Índice
Purpose: The implementation of comprehensive quality management systems in higher education institutions (HEIs) implies the need to consider not only its main mission processes but also support processes, including those providing internal services to students and teaching staff. This paper intends to illustrate how the SERVPERF instrument can contribute to HEIs quality management.
Design/methodology/approach: An empirical case was carried out to illustrate the potential of the SERVPERF instrument for the quality management of HEIs. A specific-designed questionnaire based on the SERVPERF instrument was used to collect data on students and teaching staff perceptions of post-service performance of three different support services of a selected HEI. An interview was later conducted to the institution’s director to gain a richer understanding of the results obtained and pertinence of the study.
Findings: –Overall, students and teaching staff have a positive view of the services provided. Still, improvement actions were proposed to address the critical aspects identified. The SERVPERF instrument was an adequate tool to collect data on the services’ performance and address the need for support processes quality management.
Practical implications: The research highlights the potentialities of the SERVPERF instrument in supporting managerial decisions addressing the quality of HEIs support processes.
Originality/value – The design and implementation of quality management systems in HEI has been mainly focused in the teaching and learning process, dismissing support processes. The paper sheds
some light on the potentiality of service quality instruments in improving these processes. It also contributes to the validation of the SERVPERF instrument in the higher education context.
See paper
A3ES – Agência de Avaliação e Acreditação do Ensino Superior (2016), “Reference Framework for Internal Quality Assurance Systems in Portuguese Higher Education Institutions (Adapted to the ESG 2015)”, available at: https://www.a3es.pt/sites/default/files/Referenciais%20ASIGQ_EN_V1.2_Oct2016.pdf (accessed June 2020).
Amaral, A. and Rosa, M.J. (2010) ‘Recent Trends in Quality Assurance’, Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 59-61. doi: 10.1080/13538321003679515
Abdullah, F. (2006) ‘Measuring service quality in higher education : HEdPERF versus SERVPERF’, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1), pp. 31–47. doi: 10.1108/02634500610641543.
Azar, S. and Khan, S. (2012) ‘Service Quality of Higher Education in Pakistan’, Asian Journal of University Education, 8(1), pp. 107–122.
Brochado, A. (2009) ‘Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education’, Quality Assurance in Education, 17(2), pp. 174–190. doi: 10.1108/09684880910951381.
Buttle, F. (1996) ‘SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda’, European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), pp. 8–32. doi: 10.1108/03090569610105762.
Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. (1992) ‘Measuring Service Quality – A Reexamination And Extension’, Journal of Marketing, 56(3), pp. 55–68. doi: 10.2307/1252296.
Danjuma, I. et al. (2018) ‘The Service Quality Scale Debate: A Tri-Instrument Perspective for Higher Education Institutions’, Expert Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), pp. 127–133.
Demir, A. (2017) ‘Importance of Data Analysis on Achieving the Organizational Goals during The Short Term Strategic Plan: Case of Service Quality and Students’ Satisfaction Level at Ishik University’, International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(3), pp. 110–121. doi: 10.23918/ijsses.v3i3p110.
Galeeva, R. B. (2016) ‘SERVQUAL application and adaptation for educational service quality assessments in Russian higher education’, Quality Assurance in Education, 24(3), pp. 329–348. doi: 10.1108/QAE-06-2015-0024.
Gronroos, C. (1984) ‘A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications’, European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), pp. 36–44. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000004784.
Hamid, F. S. and Yip, N. (2019) ‘Comparing service quality in public vs private distance education institutions: Evidence based on Malaysia’, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), pp. 17–34. doi: 10.17718/tojde.522368.
Law, D. C. s. (2013) ‘Initial assessment of two questionnaires for measuring service quality in the Hong Kong post-secondary education context’, Quality Assurance in Education, 21(3), pp. 231–246. doi: 10.1108/QAE-Sep-2012-0034.
Mahmoud, A. B. and Khalifa, B. (2015) ‘A confirmatory factor analysis for SERVPERF instrument based on a sample of students from Syrian universities’, Education + Training, 57(5), pp. 343–359. doi: 10.1108/eb016254.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988) ‘SERVQUAL : A multiple- Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality’, Journal of Retailing, 64(1), pp. 12–40.
Teas, R. K. (1993) ‘Consumer Expectations and the Measurement of Perceived Service Quality’, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 8(2), pp. 33–54. doi: 10.1300/J090v08n02.
Quality Management Systems; Service Quality; SERVPERF; Higher Education Institutions.
