Does the social pillar of ESG affect technical efficiency? A Stochastic Frontier Approach
Sustainability has become the new normal for value creation in the long haul, and is on the top of board agendas. We assess the relationship between the social pillar of ESG and a firm’s output gap justified by systematic inefficiency. To do so we apply a stochastic frontier model to a large sample of U.S. listed firms, spanning 2005 to 2019. Focusing on measures of companies’ management commitment and effectiveness towards catering closely to their workforce job conditions and well-being, we document an economically sizable and statistically significant positive association between technical efficiency and social responsibility performance. Employee-oriented CSR practices appear to be relevant aspects in explaining the association of socially responsible practices with technical efficiency. Firm inefficiency is explained by firm specific factors and is a decreasing (increasing) function of size and external monitoring (leverage, blockholdings and foreign sales). It is mitigated by CSR practices and external governance mechanisms, as well as market surveillance. The association between CSR and technical efficiency is non-linear and varies across industry sectors. Our results should interest managers and stakeholders in general.
JEL Classification: C73; G14, G23, G34
Adegebite, E., Guney, Y., Kwabi, F., & Tahir, S. (2019). Financial and corporate social performance in the UK listed firms: the relevance of non-linearity and lag effects. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52(2), 105-158.
Agudelo, M. A. L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4, 1.
Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business and Management 8(1), 1900500.
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
Ang, T. C., Azad, A. S. M. S., Pham, T. A. T., & Zhong, A. (2021). Firm efficiency and stock returns: Australian evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78, 101935.
Arbelo, A., Arbelo-Pérez, M., & Pérez-Gómez, P. (2021). Profit efficiency as a measure of performance and frontier models: A resource-based view. Business Research Quarterly, 24(2), 143-159.
Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-12.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (1999). Is there discretion in wage setting? Rand Journal of Economics, 30(3), 535-554.
Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407-424.
Binh, T. V., Mulatu, A., & Xu, B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and firm efficiency: Evidence from endogenous cost inefficiency stochastic frontier analysis, Applied Economics, 54-55, 6380-6392.
Bhojraj, S., Charles M. C. Lee, & Oler, D. K. (2003). What’s my line? A comparison of industry classification schemes for capital market research. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 745–774.
Cao, Z., & Rees, W. (2020). Do employee-friendly firms invest more efficiently? Evidence from labor investment efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101744.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 85-105.
Chen, P. (2023). Corporate social responsibility, financing constraints, and corporate carbon intensity: new evidence from listed Chinese companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30, 40107–40115.
Coelli, T. J., Rao, P., O’Donnell, J. & Battese, G.E. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
Chandler, D. (2022). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Sustainable Value Creation (4th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.: U.K.
Cheng, B., Iannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 1-23.
Clare, A., Keswani, A., & Motson, N. (2022). The case for integrating ESG into fixed income portfolios. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4150263 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4150263.
Cohen, J. R., Holder-Webb, L. L., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2012). Corporate reporting of nonfinancial leading indicators of economic performance and sustainability. Accounting Horizons, 26(1), 65-90.
Cronqvist, H., Heyman, F., Nilsson, M., Svaleryd, H., & Vlachos, J. (2009). Do entrenched managers pay their workers more? Journal of Finance, 64(1), 309-339.
Díaz, M.A., & Sanchez, R. (2008). Firms’ size and productivity in Spain: A stochastic frontier analysis. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 315-323.
Ellili, N. O. D. (2022). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of environmental, social, and governance disclosure papers: current topics and recommendations for future research. Environmental Research Communications, 4(9), 092001.
Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2017). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston.
Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, S. S. (2008). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change. Oxford University Press.
Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135–147
Garzón-Jiménez, R., & Zorio-Grima, A. (2021). Effects of carbon emissions, environmental disclosures and CSR assurance on cost of equity in emerging markets. Sustainability 13, 1-11.
Gulamhussen, M. A., Pinheiro, C. M., & Pozzolo, A. F. (2017). Do multinational banks create or destroy shareholder value? A cross-country analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 26, 295–313.
Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45-67.
Ismail, S., Palao, F., & Lapierre, M. (2019). Exponential transformation: Evolve your organization (and change the world) with a 10-week ExO sprint. John Wiley & Sons.
Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. A. K. Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19,233-238.
Jones, D. A., Newman, A., Shao, R., & Cooke, F. L. (2019). Advances in employee-focused micro-level research on corporate social responsibility: Situating new contributions within the current state of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 293–302.
Khuong, N. V., & Anh, L. H. T. (2022). The nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm value: the moderating role of life-cycle stages. Social Responsibility Journal forthcoming.
Kumbhakar, S.C., & Lovell, C A. K. (2003). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, M.B., & Dhawan, R. (2005). Assessing the resource base of Japanese and U.S. auto producers: A stochastic frontier production function approach. Management Science, 51(7), 1060–1075.
Lins, K.V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
López, M.V., García, A., & Rodríguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285-300.
Madorran, C., & Garcia, T. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The Spanish case. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56(1), 20-28.
Matakanye, R. M., van der Poll, H. M., & Muchara, B. (2021). Do companies in different industries respond differently to stakeholders’ pressures when prioritising environmental, social and governance sustainability performance? Sustainability 13, 120,122
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2), 268-305.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Meier, S., & Cassar, L. (2018). Stop talking about how CSR helps your bottom line. Harvard Business Review 31 (January).
Minh, T. N., & Quang, T. T. (2022). The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm efficiency: Inside the matrix of corporate finance. Finance Research Letters, 46(B), 102500.
Morck, R., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
Ng, A. W., & Leung, T. C. H. (2020). Relevance of social environmental accounting to a global financial centre under one country two systems: Engaging stakeholders for sustainability and climate change. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 40(2), 140-148.
Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167-180.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S. L., 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3), 403-441.
Pfajfar, G., Shoham, A., Małecka, A., & Zalaznik, M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 46-61.
Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2020). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: the moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1199–1214
Reifschneider, D., & Stevenson, R. (1991). Systematic departures from the frontier: A Framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. International Economic Review, 32, 715–23.
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T.M., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718-804.
Schmidt, P. (2011). One-step and two-step Estimation in SFA Models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), 201-203.
Serafeim, G. (2022). Purpose + Profit. How business Can Lift up the World. HarperCollins Leadership.
Taymaz, E. (2005). Are small firms really less productive? Small Business Economics, 25(5), 429-445.
Villiers, C., Jia, J., & Zhongtian, L. (2022). Corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical research using Thomson Reuters Asset4 data. Accounting & Finance, 6, :4523-4568.
Wang, H.-J., &Schmidt, P. (2002). One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 129–144.
Wernefelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wright, P., & Ferris, S. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 77-83.
Zaiane, S., & Ellouze, D. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: The moderating effects of size and industry sensitivity. Journal of Management and Governance (April 2022), 1-41.
Stochastic Frontier, Technical Efficiency, Corporate Social Responsibility
