Relatório de Sustentabilidade: Evolução e Estado da Arte
Relatório de Sustentabilidade: Evolução e Estado da Arte
O relatório de sustentabilidade está a ganhar cada vez mais destaque, evoluindo de uma simples vantagem competitiva para uma obrigação legal, especialmente na União Europeia (UE). Esta pesquisa pretende contribuir para uma compreensão mais profunda da relação entre a evolução legislativa e a prática do relato de sustentabilidade. Para tal, utilizou-se principalmente a base de dados Scopus e palavras-chave como “Sustentabilidade”, ” Diretiva de Relato de Sustentabilidade Corporativa – Diretiva CSRD”, “Normas Europeias de Relato da Sustentabilidade – normas ESRS”, “normas do Global Reporting Initiative – GRI” e “relatório de sustentabilidade”, na seleção dos documentos a analisar. Um dos principais resultados deste estudo, destaca o papel da UE, através da Diretiva CSRD e das normas ESRS, que procura aprimorar a integridade, comparabilidade e fiabilidade dos relatórios de sustentabilidade das organizações na região. Fora da UE, as normas GRI, precursoras das ESRS, continuam a ser relevantes. A Diretiva CSRD estabeleceu um cronograma para o cumprimento obrigatório por parte das organizações, considerando os seus respetivos âmbitos de aplicação. Ficou patente que os relatórios de sustentabilidade passaram por uma transformação substancial, tanto em termos de qualidade quanto de abrangência, refletindo um compromisso crescente das empresas com a transparência e a responsabilidade ambiental e social
Diretiva CSRD; Normas ESRS; Normas GRI; Relatório de Sustentabilidade
Isabel Maria holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, in the course of Engineering and Industrial Management. She is currently taking a master’s degree in Total Quality Management at the EEscola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Águeda.
Abu Al-Haija, E., Kolsi, M. C., & Kolsi, M. C. C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in Islamic banks: To which extent does Abu Dhabi Islamic bank comply with the global reporting initiative standards? Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(8), 1200–1223. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2020-0346
Albuquerque De Melo, L. S., & Nóbrega Barbosa, M. D. F. (2023). Análise dos ODS divulgados nos relatórios de sustentabilidade das empresas com alto potencial poluidor, integrantes do setor de Petróleo, Gás e Biocombustível da B3. REUNIR Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade, 13(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.18696/reunir.v13i1.1556
Baumüller, J., & Grbenic, S. O. (2021). MOVING FROM NON-FINANCIAL TO SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING: ANALYZING THE EU COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL FOR A CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING DIRECTIVE (CSRD). Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization, (1), 369. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO210817026B
Belinky, A. (2023). Partes interessadas ou partes interessantes? GV-EXECUTIVO, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v22n4.2023.90126
Falkenberg, C., Schneeberger, C., & Pöchtrager, S. (2023). Is Sustainability Reporting Promoting a Circular Economy? Analysis of Companies’ Sustainability Reports in the Agri-Food Sector in the Scope of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and EU Taxonomy Regulation. Sustainability, 15(9), 7498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097498
Folqué, M., Escrig-Olmedo, E., & Corzo Santamaría, M. T. (2023). Contribution of sustainable investment to sustainable development within the framework of the SDGS: The role of the asset management industry. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(5), 1075–1100. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0044
Gonçalves, T., Gaio, C., & Costa, E. (2020). Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Research, 115, 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.008
Guerreiro, M. S., Susana, O., Alexandra, B., & Rute, S. A. (2023). The Disclosure of Environmental Indicators in the Portuguese Paper Industry and Society 5.0. 2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–7. Aveiro, Portugal: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211589
Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Fauzi, H. (2022). The evolution of sustainability reporting practices in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 131798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131798
Hartikainen, H., Järvenpää, M., & Rautiainen, A. (2021). Sustainability in executive remuneration—A missing link towards more sustainable firms? Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129224
Held, M., Weidmann, D., Kammerl, D., Hollauer, C., Mörtl, M., Omer, M., & Lindemann, U. (2018). Current challenges for sustainable product development in the German automotive sector: A survey based status assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.118
Krasodomska, J., Zarzycka, E., & Zieniuk, P. (2023). Voluntary sustainability reporting assurance in the European Union before the advent of the corporate sustainability reporting directive: The country and firm‐level impact of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, sd.2744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2744
Lin, W. (2022). Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in the UK: Diversions from the EU Sustainability Reporting Framework. Sustainability, 14(15), 9134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159134
Michalak, J., Staszkiewicz, P., & Waniak-Michalak, H. (2023). Is academic recommendation translated into the European Union corporate sustainability reporting directive proposal? Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137186
Mulligan, C., Morsfield, S., & Cheikosman, E. (2023). Blockchain for sustainability: A systematic literature review for policy impact. Telecommunications Policy, 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102676
Oliveira, E., & Ferreira, P. (2014). Métodos de Investigação: Da Interrogação à Descoberta Científica (1.a ed.). Vida Económica – Editorial, S.A.
Ortiz-Martínez, E., & Marín-Hernández, S. (2023). Sustainability Information in European Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01386-7
Papa, M., Carrassi, M., Muserra, A. L., & Wieczorek-Kosmala, M. (2022). The impact of the EU nonfinancial information directive on environmental disclosure: Evidence from Italian environmentally sensitive industries. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(7), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2021-1247
Pelikánová, R. M., & Rubáček, F. (2022). Taxonomy for Transparency in Non-Financial Statements – Clear Duty With Unclear Sanction. DANUBE, 13(3), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0011
Talbot, D., Raineri, N., & Daou, A. (2021). Implementation of sustainability management tools: The contribution of awareness, external pressures, and stakeholder consultation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2033
Tettamanzi, P., Gotti Tedeschi, R., & Murgolo, M. (2023). The European Union (EU) green taxonomy: Codifying sustainability to provide certainty to the markets. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03798-6
Vander Bauwhede, H., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2022). Determinants and Value Relevance of Voluntary Assurance of Sustainability Reports in a Mandatory Reporting Context: Evidence from Europe. Sustainability, 14(15), 9795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159795
Zdolšek, D., & Beloglavec, S. T. (2023). Sustainability Reporting Ecosystem: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Overhaul during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 15(9), 7349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097349
Zenkina, I. (2023). Ensuring the transparency of ESG reporting based on the development of its standardization. E3S Web of Conferences, 371, 05077. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337105077